Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

iphone fun

journal photo

Subscribe to Journal

Sunday, January 24th 2010

4:04 PM

Your Federal Tax dollars fund senseless & baseless animal cruelty---YOURS-

  • Mood:

For years now, the UW-Madison has tried to portray a cadre of local folks who complain about its animal experiments as wackos.

Well it turns out that the local Alliance for Animals and other people who have been doing the complaining have been right about a lot of things.

Toward the end of 2009, inspectors from the U.S. Department of Agriculture pulled a surprise visit to UW’s research labs and discovered at least 20 oversight violations. The list included depressed and vomiting dogs, expired medications, a dirty operating room, and slippery and unclean floors where pigs would routinely fall down.

The feds told the UW to fix the problems immediately or risk losing more than $200 million in animal research funding that the Department of Agriculture sends the school.

An embarrassed Eric Sandgren, the UW’s head of animal research oversight who has frequently debated the animal rights advocates, said the university is working to fix the violations and make sure they don’t happen again.

One of Alliance for Animals’ main gripes is that the UW uses animals for experiments when it isn’t necessary.

And indeed, one of the USDA’s surprise inspection findings was that in at least five studies, the UW researchers did not show that they attempted to find an alternative to painful experiments on animals.

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/column/dave_zweifel/article_847af96e-48a6-5ed4-975d-f9f3c116933a.html?mode=story


  • GBShaw said on: January 17, 2010, 5:34 pm
    Mr Zweifel, what are your thoughts on Eric Sandgren's Saturday letter? Is Todd going to continue following up on this story?
  • LiberalScum said on: January 17, 2010, 12:07 pm
    rhurley: do you have specifics? Unfortunately, you are absolutely correct - Dr Hess is the best documented case I am aware of. UW employees, including the veterinarians, are under constant threat of termination if they point out animal neglect - that is undisputed. Eric Sandgren and his ilk have fired so many employees for speaking up. It would be great if there was some sort of outside investigation, such as by the state legislature. It is unlikely that Dr Martin has the morals, or political clout, to do much about this. So far, she has shown no evidence of backbone nor ethical substance. So sad.
  • rhurley said on: January 12, 2010, 12:16 pm
    As an experienced licenced veterinarian who has worked inside the UW animal research system and at the primate center, it is my experience that people who bring up ethical and human and animal saftey concerns have a surprisingly high rate of harassment and employment termination. Other veterinarians who work there do not express to the powers that be their similar concerns because they do not want to lose their jobs. There exists a feifdom of ignorant politicians running the animal research at UW Madison which need to be replaced by professionals. Please convey this to the chancellor of UW
  • Genie said on: January 12, 2010, 8:07 am
    Yes, this is true. I worked at the Waisman Center years ago and there were problems there. Most scientists were very conscientious, But there was a whole colony of brown rats that was destroyed because the researcher got a job elsewhere. There were other problem with the dogs and monkeys too.
  • LiberalScum said on: January 11, 2010, 7:37 pm
    Thank you for that insight. There are far more members of the research community on campus disgusted with this situation than there are animal rights activists. Is this whole situation going to go the way of other violations, victim of a slow news cycle? There is a long history of UW employees being fired for pointing out just these type of violations.
    Maybe someone should ask Eric Sandgren about his promise to inform the media about violations back in 2005.
  • 1 Comment(s).